JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 13, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Manuel Santiago Urueta Ayola

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica formulado en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto el término de corrección de la misma venció en silencio.

La Sala Plena encuentra improcedente el recurso interpuesto y decide CONFIRMAR el auto suplicado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 10 de marzo de 2016, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Manuel Santiago Urueta Ayola contra los artículos 74 al 82, 161-2 y 161-6 de la Ley 1437 de 2011 "Por la cual se expide el Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo", por infringir los artículos 23, 152 y 153 de la Constitución y 24 de la Declaración Americana de los Derechos y Deberes del Hombre.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decisión al recurrente, informándole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.